Frequently Asked Questions

I’m drawn to work that has substance—projects with a clear point of view, intellectual curiosity, or cultural weight. This can range from digital design and systems thinking to exploratory concepts that sit somewhere between craft, research, and practice.

Usually through conversation. Someone encounters my work, reads something I’ve written, or spends time with a project I’ve shared. From there, we talk—informally at first—to see if there’s alignment before anything is defined.

There’s structure, but it’s quiet. I value clarity, pacing, and intention, but I don’t force a rigid framework onto every project. The process adapts to the work rather than the other way around.

Good questions. Projects that aren’t fully resolved yet, that leave room for thinking and refinement. I’m especially engaged when design is treated as a tool for understanding—not just presentation.

Deliberately. I care about decisions holding up over time. That doesn’t mean slow for the sake of it—but it does mean allowing space for ideas to mature when needed.

Both. I’m comfortable working independently, but I also enjoy collaborating with people who respect craft, clarity, and thoughtful dialogue. The scale of the work usually determines the setup.

Digital tools are part of the practice, but they’re not the focus. I’m more interested in systems, structure, language, and intent than in any specific platform or technology.

Yes—sometimes those are the most interesting. As long as there’s mutual trust and curiosity, I’m comfortable working in early or ambiguous stages to help shape direction.

Very. I don’t hand things off and disappear. I stay engaged from early thinking through refinement, ensuring coherence between ideas and outcomes.

I value honesty, clarity, and care in the work. I’m not interested in volume or spectacle—only in doing things well, with intention, and for the right reasons.